Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoY=+HaO+21Ost5oWR2mR32vEDak8rVguzkMP6SD3pjxgQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 (Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > 1. Should we promote pglogical in the beta as something to *test*? No. But the reason depends on the answer to this question: Is pglogical a core submission or a third-party product? If it's the former, then getting people to test such things is the purpose of a CommitFest, not a beta announcement, and in fact it did get tested and reviewed as part of the CommitFest just like many other patches which were also submitted, except that it got more enthusiasm than many until it became clear that no updates in response to review comments would be forthcoming. If it's the latter, then we don't promote third-party products in beta announcements; 2ndQuadrant can make their own announcements about pglogical in accordance with https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NewsEventsApproval just like anyone else. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: