Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY9VxpRaWA7mx0t6-pw5_XLj-Cd_E0oueUtqikUTEu+3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking (Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add --syntax to postgres for SQL syntax checking
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:12 PM Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm totally OK to mark this as rejected and indeed 45 lines were just > minimal patch to create PoC (I have coded this during last PGConf.eu > lunch break) and mainly to start discussion. Thanks for understanding. > I'm not sure everyone in this thread understands the reason for this > patch, which is clearly my fault, since I have failed to explain. Main > idea is to make a tool to validate query can be parsed, that's all. > Similar to running "EXPLAIN query", but not caring about the result > and not caring about the DB structure (ignoring missing tables, ...), > just checking it was successfully executed. This definitely belongs to > the server side and not to the client side, it is just a tool to > validate that for this running PostgreSQL backend it is a "parseable" > query. I don't think it's at all obvious that this belongs on the server side rather than the client side. I think it could be done in either place, or both. I just think we don't have the infrastructure to do it cleanly, at present. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: