Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> One thing I was pointed out, it is the reason why I implemented
> DDL support, is that intermediation of c-language function also
> loads the extension module implicitly. It is an advantage, but
> not sure whether it shall be supported from the beginning.

That is definitely an advantage of the DDL-based approach, but I think
it's too much extra machinery for not enough real advantage.  Sounds
like we all agree, so ...

> I'd like to follow this direction, and start stripping the DDL support.

...please make it so.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company