Re: Translations contributions urgently needed
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Translations contributions urgently needed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY6PORb0OFDkH=JCep3iqSehgAuTTcaNaQZR00taJ6jSw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Translations contributions urgently needed (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Translations contributions urgently needed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> writes: >> Something that isn't clear to me is, for a language that didn't meet >> 80% translation for a component, if it does reach 80% after the major >> version release, does it then get shipped in a minor release, or is >> out of that version completely until the next major version? > > No, it'll be added to the next minor release as soon as it reaches > 80%. That's happened routinely in the past. I have no idea how > automated that policy is -- you could ask Peter E. -- but a trawl > through the commit logs shows .po files getting added in minor > releases from time to time. https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NLS#Minimum_Translation implies the opposite, because it refers to inclusion "in a PostgreSQL major release". -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: