Re: View with duplicate GROUP BY entries
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: View with duplicate GROUP BY entries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY6Jn67wBdU9pzgYhNLV33kAYenQUV6VqD02HXjQah5-w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: View with duplicate GROUP BY entries (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: View with duplicate GROUP BY entries
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> While reviewing patch for similar problem in postgres_fdw [1], I >> noticed that we don't use positional notation while creating the view. >> This might introduced anomalies when GROUP BY entries are >> non-immutable. > > Yeah, we probably ought to make more of an effort to regenerate the > original query wording. I do not think that forcing positional notation > is a suitable answer in this case, because it would result in converting > SQL-standard queries to nonstandard ones. Who cares? The other end is presumptively PostgresSQL, because this is postgres_fdw. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: