Re: Issue with bgworker, SPI and pgstat_report_stat
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issue with bgworker, SPI and pgstat_report_stat |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY61zbqZjBiWT=jkFkf9sGacG+pjkTnv0uKZZw2t0nsYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issue with bgworker, SPI and pgstat_report_stat (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issue with bgworker, SPI and pgstat_report_stat
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Tomas Vondra > <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> In any case, I think adding the pgstat_report_stat() into worker_spi seems >> like a reasonable (and backpatchable) fix. > > Doing just that sounds reasonable seen from here. I am wondering also > if it would not be worth mentioning in the documentation of the > bgworkers that users trying to emulate somewhat the behavior of a > backend should look at PostgresMain(). The code in itself is full of > hints as well. Everybody seems happy with this fix for a first step, so I've committed it and back-patched it to 9.3. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: