Re: Is this a bug?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is this a bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY5_gA67NE5u3+YZsWsWXcvdUpiGNV+S5Ai0dRk=razDQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is this a bug? (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is this a bug?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Well, it's fairly harmless, but it might not be a bad idea to tighten that >>> up. >> The attached patch tighten that up. > Hm... It might be interesting to include it in 9.4 IMO, somewhat > grouping with what has been done in a6542a4 for SET and ABORT. Meh. There will always be another thing we could squeeze in; I don't think this is particularly urgent, and it's late to the party. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: