Re: Replication slots and footguns
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication slots and footguns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY58PG2o3gGCSUPje+17dRTjd6k1yu-R8-XruWU7ipdVQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication slots and footguns (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 03/13/2014 05:28 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Well we may have kind of hosed ourselves, because the in-memory data >> structures that represent the data structure have an in_use flag that >> indicates whether the structure is allocated at all, and then an >> active flag that indicates whether some backend is using it. I never >> liked that naming much. Maybe we should go through and let in_use -> >> allocated and active -> in_use. > > Wait, which one of those does pg_drop_replication_slot() care about? Well... the slots that aren't in_use can't be dropped because they don't exist in the first place. The ones that aren't active can't be dropped because somebody else is using them. So both, sorta, I guess? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: