Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY53vKX5TTEjhCcLFxETatTCguACS98BgkwMDcVnU2y9g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?
Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > The half unmaintainedness of autoconf (no release in five years counts > as that imo), sure makes it look like a good idea to move on to cmake or > such at some point... I don't necessarily see that as a reason to move. If we're hitting bugs in autoconf that are causing problems, and we can't get them fixed in the upstream, that's a reason. But switching build systems won't be frictionless, so I'm not in favor of it unless there's a clear payoff. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: