Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY4ExqYbhurdi=D-J2ovWD6hkhc0XDH+B1z3FDpYAe+nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Checksum errors in pg_stat_database (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 5:21 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Would it make sense to add a column to pg_stat_database showing the total number of checksum errors that have occurredin a database? > > It's really a ">1 means it's bad", but it's a lot easier to monitor that in the statistics views, and given how much alot of people set their systems out to log, it's far too easy to miss individual checksum matches in the logs. > > If we track it at the database level, I don't think the overhead of adding one more counter would be very high either. It's probably not the idea way to track it. If you have a terabyte or fifty of data, and you see that you have some checksum failures, good luck finding the offending blocks. But I'm tentatively in favor of your proposal anyway, because it's pretty simple and cheap and might help people, and doing something noticeably better is probably annoyingly complicated. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: