Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY44haYRLv3cnFw+YtdDx-eLW44LZAjjsvCFFKE8v08fg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:36 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 06:38:55PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 5/12/17 18:13, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> > I think for logical replication the tuple should appear as being in the >> > parent table, not the partition. No? >> >> Logical replication replicates base table to base table. How those >> tables are tied together into a partitioned table or an inheritance tree >> is up to the system catalogs on each side. > > This seems like a totally reasonable approach to pg_dump, especially > in light of the fact that logical replication already (and quite > reasonably) does it this way. Hard work has been done to make > tuple-routing cheap, and this is one of the payoffs. Cheap isn't free, though. It's got a double-digit percentage overhead rather than a large-multiple-of-the-runtime overhead as triggers do, but people still won't want to pay it unnecessarily, I think. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: