Re: parallelizing the archiver

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 1:14 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
> IIUC this would mean that archive modules that need to define GUCs or
> register background workers would have to separately define a
> _PG_init() and be loaded via shared_preload_libraries in addition to
> archive_library.  That doesn't seem too terrible to me, but it was
> something I was trying to avoid.

Hmm. That doesn't seem like a terrible goal, but I think we should try
to find some way of achieving it that looks tidier than this does.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com