Re: Identifying function-lookup failures due to argument name mismatches
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Identifying function-lookup failures due to argument name mismatches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY252OoQXuMe0rHYJ58-d81M3=KrkEqjYzaXjvQb8Zy5Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Identifying function-lookup failures due to argument name mismatches (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Identifying function-lookup failures due to argument name mismatches
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 4:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The primary error message is not varying, only the DETAIL/HINT, so > I find this concern pretty far-fetched. Also, I believe that the > case that the message intends to help with is very common and so > it will save a lot of people time, more than enough to outweigh > any cases where it's perhaps un-optimal. I'm not entirely convinced, but you could well be right. I do like all the other detailed diagnostics, I think, I just wasn't sure about that one. But I'm not really here to argue, just giving my opinion. > That is the response to > > ERROR: function public.dep_req2() does not exist > LINE 1: SELECT public.dep_req2() || ' req3b' > ^ > -HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You might need to add explicit type casts. > > and I omitted the hint/detail because it seems to add nothing, Yeah, OK, that's fair. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: