Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY1cDOZGOW_4-P_+opzm0CK32V89x+b+7bCpD2LDxBhpg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote: >> Yeah, that's not crazy. I find it a bit surprising in terms of the >> semantics, though. SET >> when_i_try_to_insert_into_a_specific_partition_i_dont_really_mean_it = >> true? > > Maybe > SET partition_tuple_retry = true; > -or- > SET partition_tuple_reroute = true; > ? > > I like the idea of only rerouting when failing constraints although I > can envision where there might be use cases where you essentially want > to re-partition and therefore reroute everything, leading to: > > SET partition_tuple_reroute = (none | error | all); Personally, I think it's more elegant to make this a pg_dump option than to make it a server GUC, but I'm not going to spend time fighting the server GUC idea if other people like it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: