Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY0s1sXrUCM7z=fy9r6=rDPWrDeW_xdTAPwNVCC+UD3GA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 1:28 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:18 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure that some people believe that wraparound can cause > > > actual data corruption > > > > Well, historically they're not wrong. > > True, but the most recent version where that's actually possible is > PostgreSQL 8.0, which was released in early 2005. That was a very > different time for the project. I don't think that people believe that > wraparound can cause data corruption because they remember a time when > it really could. It seems like general confusion to me (which could > have been avoided). No, I think it's PostgreSQL 13, because before the vacuum failsafe thing you could end up truncating enough tables during vacuum operations to actually wrap around. And even in 14+, you can still do that, if you use single user mode. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: