Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name

Hi,

> This is a very good catch and a suggestion. I've slightly reworked the patch, and I also made this static assertion to have less indirection and, therefore, make it easier to understand the premise.
> Version 2 is attached.

```
sizeof((BackgroundWorker *)NULL)->bgw_library_name
```

I'm pretty confident something went wrong with the parentheses in v2.


--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev