Re: Does anyone know of any issues around ARRAY UNNEST
От | Belinda Cussen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does anyone know of any issues around ARRAY UNNEST |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+QS4W6Wzg_ng6ACincg4yLRyxwqyoaniVx+-nV+dL7gCwvPLQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does anyone know of any issues around ARRAY UNNEST (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Thanks!
--
On 28 November 2011 14:30, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Belinda Cussen <belinda.cussen@servian.com.au> writes:
> I've managed to produce this fault consistently now.> Below is the simplified code:
> CREATE TABLE foo_1 (id int primary key,media_uri TEXT);
> INSERT INTO foo_1(id) SELECT i FROM generate_series(1,1000000) g(i);
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION bb_crash_db_5 () RETURNS TEXT AS $$
> DECLARE
> v_activity_id_list INTEGER ARRAY;
> BEGIN
> SELECT ARRAY(SELECT id FROM foo_1 ORDER BY id LIMIT 100000) INTO
> v_activity_id_list;
> UPDATE foo_1
> SET media_uri = 'a'
> WHERE id IN (SELECT activity_id FROM UNNEST (v_activity_id_list)
> activity_id)
> ;
> return 'success';
> END;
> $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;> I then open 2 command lines and run:Thanks, I was able to reproduce it with this test case. It turns out
> select bb_crash_db_5();
not to have anything directly to do with UNNEST, but with the code that
deals with concurrent row updates.
I've committed a fix, which will appear in next week's updates.
Thanks for the report and test case!
regards, tom lane
![]() | Belinda Cussen | Servian Pty Ltd | m: 0466 309 169 | t: 02 9376 0700 | f: 02 9376 0730 |
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: