log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement
| От | Atul Kumar |
|---|---|
| Тема | log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+ONtZ7dOdN4hdqcgrNeVAe1U2BDGyYDA53aG2FydbM5s1qJ1g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement
Re: log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement Re: log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement Re: log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I have a query about parameters and log_statement
my postgres version is 12 and running on centos 7
my log_statement is set to "DDL".
and log_min_duration_statement is set to "1ms"
so technically it should log "ONLY DDLs" that take more than 1ms.
but to my surprise, postgres is logging DML as well which is taking more than 1ms.
What am I missing here to understand, because as per my understanding log_statement and log_min_duration_statement are correlated, postgres should log according to log_statement parameter.
my postgres version is 12 and running on centos 7
my log_statement is set to "DDL".
and log_min_duration_statement is set to "1ms"
so technically it should log "ONLY DDLs" that take more than 1ms.
but to my surprise, postgres is logging DML as well which is taking more than 1ms.
What am I missing here to understand, because as per my understanding log_statement and log_min_duration_statement are correlated, postgres should log according to log_statement parameter.
Please advise me on this behavior.
Regards,
Atul
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: