Re: meson "experimental"?
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: meson "experimental"? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+OCxozomuTH=5hWcDcQ-Q+SUVRZXpSoB+CP8Zj3n00kYZX3Vw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: meson "experimental"? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: meson "experimental"?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 16:25, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:41 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> "Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is the only
> option for building PostgreSQL in Windows using Visual Something[*].
> For other platforms, using Meson is currently experimental."
Is it, though? I feel like we're beyond the experimental stage now.
I clearly missed the discussion in which it was decided to remove the old MSVC++ support from the tree (and am disappointed about that as I would have objected loudly). Having recently started testing Meson on Windows when I realised that change had been made, and having to update builds for pgAdmin and the Windows installers, I think it's clear it's far more experimental on that platform than it is on Linux at least.
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: