Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxozk5HT+kL0hbFMXvQH30F-pwCDaC8TqZ0ZJZR_qbDnstg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL >> > together? >> >> See >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.GA28344%40awork2.anarazel.de > > True, but the current license is unchanged and has the advertising > clause, which I think we have to honor if we ship OpenSSL: > > https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html > > I assume Windows has to ship OpenSSL with the installer and has to abide > by this, for example. OSX might have to do the same. It might be good > to see what we do for Windows packages. We already do it for all our installers - Windows, OSX and Linux. We have to, otherwise we wouldn't be able to ensure the same binaries would run on all the different supported versions. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: