Re: SSH Tunneling implementation
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSH Tunneling implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxoxvz2GF77SApK3JFvw_Zvh8o20rev_ocfeQ5u0wbP65Mg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSH Tunneling implementation (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSH Tunneling implementation
Re: SSH Tunneling implementation |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Can we identify which version of libssh is required, and have a > configure check for it? AFAICT they are all on 1.2 until the *next* > release - so is it really something that breaks on just a minor > version? If so, we really need a configure check for it. > > I think it's ok to say that we can't build with that feature on 10.04 > (assuming we can find a configure test for it). less sure about > something that's less than a year old such as 11.10. Yeah, that seems reasonable. I'd also suggest pinging the libssh2 mailing lists to see if there's another API that you've missed, or if they can explain why it's necessary to provide the public key and private one. So... something to think about in parallel with that; if we cannot deal with this cleanly using libssh2, should we go back to the original plan that Akshay and I discussed privately, which was to have pgAdmin spawn ssh (or putty on Windows) processes to provide the tunnels? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: