Re: Request for project mailing list: pgsql-pkg-docker
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Request for project mailing list: pgsql-pkg-docker |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxoxnsC7GiGhW2FY4GrZbYNbnoVOGxW+OZ9xjJG6aYcxXUA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Request for project mailing list: pgsql-pkg-docker (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> It's exactly the kind of discussion that does need to happen, unless >> we're just going to say yes or no to everyone. We're not a general >> hosting provider for anyone who wants it, nor do we have the resources >> to become one. > > "Is there demand" is a useful question when creating a list. > > "Is project X worthwhile or not" isn't. Namely, my comment was in > response to this: > > "Forgive my naive question. How is Docker PostgeSQL useful for real > world use case?" Whilst I agree that that particular question is not appropriate, "Is project X worthwhile or not" certainly is appropriate, in as much as worthwhile equates to "having demand from users". I don't care if individuals think a project is not worthwhile - I do care if no-one thinks it's worthwhile, or if a lot of people think it is. > Maybe it's past time for us to have a formal set of criteria and process > for requesting new lists, just like we do for other kinds of web stuff > like events? A lot of the arguments here might be avoidable with one. Yes, that seems perfectly reasonable. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: