Re: PATCH: Preferences/Options dialog
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: Preferences/Options dialog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxoxiDN=c0nRcLL24zKxnusHk9xkRNTxp-Rb4KOagdyzJ_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: Preferences/Options dialog (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: Preferences/Options dialog
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
And here's the attachment. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ashesh Vashi >>> <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dave, >>>> >>>> Please find the patch adding support for the preferences/options dialog. >>>> Initial patch was shared by Khushboo with me, but - I made some design >>>> changes. >>>> >>>> With this patch: >>>> * Each preferences can be saved/retrieved per module basis. >>>> * An object is created which represent that module in the preferences by >>>> default. >>>> * Module needs to override the register_preferences(...) method to >>>> register certain preference. >>>> * You can access other modules preference using static methods of the >>>> preferences. >>>> * A collection module (PGChildModule) will register >>>> show_node_<NODE_TYPE>, and also refers the 'show_system_objects' in it, >>>> which can be accessed using self.pref_show_system_objects, or can use class >>>> property 'show_system_obejcts', also there is one more property 'show_node', >>>> which uses the 'pref_show_node' object of that module. >>> >>> >>> I've done an initial review: >> >> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> - The patch has bit-rotted, and needs to be rebased. >> >> Done. >>> >>> >>> - web/pgadmin/preferences/__init__.py has an out of date copyright notice >>> with no blank line after it, and no pydoc comment to introduce the file. >> >> Done. >>> >>> >>> I don't see anything else that seems horrendously wrong at the moment, >>> but will look more closely once the rebase has been done. >> >> Please find the updated patch. >> > > Thanks. Is it dependent on any other patches? I'm getting the attached > message when expanding the server group node (I have the schema/catalog > patch applied). > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: