Re: 10.0
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 10.0 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+OCxoxfe+m2x39yoctmtNjhRcF_6w_RxbzGrFbBWgUWyMjvXQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 10.0 (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 10.0
Re: 10.0 Re: 10.0 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > Well, one potential issues is that there may be projects which have > already coded in 9.6 checks for feature support. I suspect that won't be an issue (I never heard of it being for 7.5, which was released as 8.0 - but is smattered all over pgAdmin 3 for example) - largely because in such apps we're almost always checking for a version greater than or less than x.y. I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: