Re: Updates for PostgreSQL.org one-click installer download pages
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Updates for PostgreSQL.org one-click installer download pages |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+OCxoxf1rh6GmMgyKurYt_mdgpeX3NPtsEM7wqTnRMREPJANA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Updates for PostgreSQL.org one-click installer download pages ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Updates for PostgreSQL.org one-click installer
download pages
|
| Список | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On 06/29/2016 11:09 AM, Dave Page wrote: > >> >> This cannot, and should not be re-organised on a whim, given that we >> managed to get the "what the heck do I download" questions down to >> basically zero after a lot of effort many years ago. >> > > I am not in anyway suggesting this should be on whim, if I was I would just > submit patches without any community discussion first. I do not believe even discussing patches is enough in this case, given the time, effort and proven effect the current layout had. I don't disagree that it can be improved further - but I strongly feel that any major changes to structure need to be *very* carefully considered, and proven (A/B testing perhaps). That is an aside to this patch though, which merely updates an old description that's been in place for years. With the exception of the correction I've asked Marc to make, do you believe there is any legitimate reason why the current pages should not be updated as requested (without applying any new rules that we may or may not agree on at some point in the future)? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: