Re: improving PL/Python builds on OS X
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: improving PL/Python builds on OS X |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxox_nzoiznj499QTB09viCZ0PLd12kiY6-ytGeh3zGwWQg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: improving PL/Python builds on OS X (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:11 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 5/9/13 3:25 AM, Dave Page wrote: >> > BTW - it's always worked fine for us on 64 bit machines with the past >> > few major releases of both PG and Python - are you saying that's pure >> > chance? >> >> It works because ActiveState Python has PIC inside a static library. >> But we have no straightforward way of knowing that (AFAIK), other than >> observing whether the build result crashes or not. > > After further digging, it seems to me that their build is not a standard > build. They must be patching in compiler options through the backdoor > somehow. Their config/Makefile has > > BASECFLAGS= -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC > > meaning that they compile *everything* with those options. But that's > not something that the standard Python configure script can produce. Huh, interesting. I used to have a contact at ActiveState - I'll see if I can get some more details. > Again, reliably detecting that might be difficult. Yeah, that's understandable. As long as I can force it though (and your suggestion on that front seems to work fine), I'm happy. Thanks. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: