Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #3077 - ERROR: invalid byte sequence forencoding "LATIN1":0x00
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #3077 - ERROR: invalid byte sequence forencoding "LATIN1":0x00 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxowewcNdbkyHe-1Y0w3HA3R_eTKA5mBKDvF48PArj4pp0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #3077 - ERROR: invalid byte sequence forencoding "LATIN1":0x00 (Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #3077 - ERROR: invalid byte sequence forencoding "LATIN1":0x00
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io> wrote:
-- HiThe patch looks good, do we have any example error that we can test in order to ensure the problem no longer shows up in the future?If they could be Unit Tests instead of Feature tests that would be awesome, because Feature tests are much more expensive then Unit.
I think we need to consider a couple of options here:
1) Make sure that many/all of our tests use non-ASCII names.
2) Consider adding a mechanism to allow running the regression tests with overridden GUC values. For example, a parameter in the test config file that gives a set of GUCs to change upon connection.
The downside of 2 of course, is that it adds a huge amount of possible environment combinations to test.
Thoughts?
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: