Re: Planet posting policy
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Planet posting policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxowaUMZx1qRd2NUiX4dbq3Y2dELW95PMye_V-VALoMmWvA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Planet posting policy (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Planet posting policy
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > The line is closer for EDB and PEM. I think it's possible to write a PEM > blog post that fits the current rules. If I were tasked with doing that, > I'd start with some informative comments about things that are hard to > monitor in regular PostgreSQL, and what sorts of problems the general > management headaches related to it cause. Then an ending that introduces > PEM as an example of how one company addressed those problems in a > commercial product would be fine. I'd walk away knowing something useful > about common deployment problems, and the fact that a commercial product was > suggested as one way to solve them would be helpful. It's interesting that you think that's possible. I've thus far refused requests from our marketing department to do exactly at as I thought it would certainly be a violation of the policy. I'm not convinced it wouldn't be even now, but it's interesting to know you might find something acceptable. When I get a hour (probably a couple of years from now as things are currently looking!) I might give it a whirl and run it past you guys. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: