Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxowArKuYLY+j3Niu1E4GVhr9Nck9wN8CsAi0oEYHCNTROQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | status/timeline of pglogical? (Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Re: status/timeline of pglogical? Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Folks, > > I'm wondering whether or not we should be promoting pglogical with the > release as an external extension. We have a long standing practice of not promoting external tools/utilities/add-ons in docs or with releases - as you know we went out of our way to remove such references from the docs years ago. This becomes especially problematic when such external tools/utilities/add-ons have been developed by one particular company, as Robert pointed out here http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZVBmTnUT419mS3pV9hESJh78gibD_2tviaoGMWvOTwtg@mail.gmail.com I strongly oppose recommending any non-core 'stuff' in the docs or press releases/announcements (including pgAdmin 4). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: