Re: Patch for pgagent RM1878 [pgAgent]
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch for pgagent RM1878 [pgAgent] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxow7-99Cym1T60ZpCh+K1MLOZM+RUYXR+3wzkg1XczEKTw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch for pgagent RM1878 [pgAgent] (Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > > -- > Harshal Dhumal > Software Engineer > > EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Harshal Dhumal >> <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> > Hi Dave, >> > >> > I mean reverse engineered sql tab. Currently it's not implemented for >> > both >> > pgagent schedule and jobs. >> >> Yes it is - that's the change I made to your patch: "one change to >> *enable* the SQL tabs everywhere". > > > Ok. >> >> >> > I have created Rm for that RM1891 >> >> Please confirm it's working now, and update the ticket accordingly. It >> won't hurt to have that listed as a separate change for 1.1. > > > SQL tab in create and update properties mode works properly also Fahar > tested and closed same issue. > > The ticket 1891 is for reverse engineered SQL. Currently it's giving 404 > error when reverse engineered SQL tab is selected for schedule or job. I > have also attached screen shot in RM1891. > > In pgadmin3 I can't see reverse engineered SQL for both schedule or jobs. So > I'm confused whether we need to add implementation of same in pgAdmin4 or > disabled reverse engineered SQL. Oh, I see - yes, I'd like to generate it for consistency with other object types. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: