Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions (checkAsUser)

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:30 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 4:12 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:40 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > > > On 2023-Feb-20, Amit Langote wrote:
> > > >> One more thing we could try is come up with a postgres_fdw test case,
> > > >> because it uses the RelOptInfo.userid value for remote-costs-based
> > > >> path size estimation.  But adding a test case to contrib module's
> > > >> suite test a core planner change might seem strange, ;-).
> > >
> > > > Maybe.  Perhaps adding it in a separate file there is okay?
> > >
> > > There is plenty of stuff in contrib module tests that is really
> > > there to test core-code behavior.  (You could indeed argue that
> > > *all* of contrib is there for that purpose.)  If it's not
> > > convenient to test something without an extension, just do it
> > > and don't sweat about that.
> >
> > OK.  Attached adds a test case to postgres_fdw's suite.  You can see
> > that it fails without a316a3bc.
>
> Noticed that there's an RfC entry for this in the next CF.  Here's an
> updated version of the patch where I updated the comments a bit and
> the commit message.
>
> I'm thinking of pushing this on Friday barring objections.

Seeing none, I've pushed this to HEAD and 16.

Marking the CF entry as committed.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com