Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqHQmGsY0g5wCuQeNQr8YYO01grtT4Ui+x0sk14JMF=Q5A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:58 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > I had one small comment: > > +{ > > + int copied_bytes = 0; > > + > > +#define BUF_BYTES (cstate->raw_buf_len - cstate->raw_buf_index) > > +#define DRAIN_COPY_RAW_BUF(cstate, dest, nbytes)\ > > + do {\ > > + memcpy((dest), (cstate)->raw_buf + > > (cstate)->raw_buf_index, (nbytes));\ > > + (cstate)->raw_buf_index += (nbytes);\ > > + } while(0) > > > > BUF_BYTES could be used in CopyLoadRawBuf function also. > > > > Thanks Vignesh for the find out. I changed and attached the v5 patch. > The regression tests(make check and make check-world) ran > successfully. Good idea, thanks. In CopyLoadRawBuf(), we could also change the condition if (cstate->raw_buf_index < cstate->raw_buf_len) to if (BUF_BYTES > 0), which looks clearer. Also, if we are going to use the macro more generally, let's make it look less localized. For example, rename it to RAW_BUF_BYTES similar to RAW_BUF_SIZE and place their definitions close by. It also seems like a good idea to make 'cstate' a parameter for clarity. Attached v6. -- Amit Langote EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: