Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqH86BSZ7mKzqBGX9P0AN1LAoDj=cVwbKm5E0yoaU0FcMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 6:05 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 4:38 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:48 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 5:43 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com > > > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > So, If we want to share the cached partition between statements, we seems cannot > > > > use ExecPartitionCheck. Instead, I tried directly invoke the partition support > > > > function(partsupfunc) to check If the cached info is correct. In this approach I > > > > tried cache the *bound offset* in PartitionDescData, and we can use the bound offset > > > > to get the bound datum from PartitionBoundInfoData and invoke the partsupfunc > > > > to do the CHECK. > > > > > > > > Attach a POC patch about it. Just to share an idea about sharing cached partition info > > > > between statements. > > > > > > I have not looked at your patch yet, but yeah that's what I would > > > imagine doing it. > > > > Just read it and think it looks promising. > > > > On code, I wonder why not add the rechecking-cached-offset code > > directly in get_partiiton_for_tuple(), instead of adding a whole new > > function for that. Can you please check the attached revised version? I should have clarified a bit more on why I think a new function looked unnecessary to me. The thing about that function that bothered me was that it appeared to duplicate a lot of code fragments of get_partition_for_tuple(). That kind of duplication often leads to bugs of omission later if something from either function needs to change. -- Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: