Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqGriz_GLqOpnHe5jn08v6WVgx+K9pMAfvk8wgUDySDygQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 9:51 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 18:25 Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So, maybe you're saying that "waiting for checkpoint" is ambiguous and > > > most people will assume it means "...to start". As for me, I assume > > > it ends with "...to finish". > > I'm not sure "most peple will assume" or not, so I said "I'm not > sure". For example, I feel strangeness to use "I'm waiting for Amit" > to express that I'm waiting Amit to leave there. That phrase gives me > such kind of uneasiness. > > I thought of "establishing checkpoint" or "running a checkpoint" as > other candidates. Okay, I understand. I am fine with "running checkpoint", although I think "waiting for checkpoint" isn't totally wrong either. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: