Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqGYYx3L80Qvtv-4tkeeeq315mjSuKSGqAejswqmwq6YSA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE (Damir Ciganović-Janković <damir.ciganovic.jankovic@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Damir, On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:32 PM Damir Ciganović-Janković <damir.ciganovic.jankovic@gmail.com> wrote: > About those improvements you are mentioning, have you maybe alaready created a task/issue on them? So that I can trackit and do the upgrade once the version with these improvements goes out No, I haven't sent any proposal for that yet. Maybe you know, but development is done by sending design proposals and associated patches to the pgsql-hackers mailing list. The only way to track what's being developed is to subscribe to that mailing list and follow discussion threads of topics that are of interest to you. You're always welcome to participate in those discussions if you have ideas, review comments on the design, patches, etc. I may propose improvements to the pruning logic when the next development cycle begins a few months later. I don't know if I will remember to reply here to remind you to follow the development. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: