Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqFK6V0ZJtz=LYk2dBrqy9b_zfLtMaRDn6g1gbSuA5R+Xg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 7:01 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 6:06 PM Keisuke Kuroda > <keisuke.kuroda.3862@gmail.com> wrote: > > However, as already mentioned, the problem of memory bloat on DELETE remains. > > This can be solved by the patch in [1], but I think it is too much to apply > > this patch only for DELETE. What do you think? > > > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/cab4b85d-9292-967d-adf2-be0d803c3e23%40nttcom.co.jp_1 > > Hmm, the patch tries to solve a general problem that SPI plans are not > being shared among partitions whereas they should be. So I don't > think that it's necessarily specific to DELETE. Until we have a > solution like the patch on this thread for DELETE, it seems fine to > consider the other patch as a stopgap solution. Forgot to mention one thing. Alvaro, in his last email on that thread, characterized that patch as fixing a bug, although I may have misread that. -- Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: