Re: remaining sql/json patches
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: remaining sql/json patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqF4nrbnLDPXqNHhiOQDj0tbRSf2oaF+Wvg8U2ckNd6H=A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: remaining sql/json patches (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 22:46 jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 8:06 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Indeed.
>
> This boils down to the difference in the cast expression chosen to
> convert the source value to int in the two cases.
>
> The case where the source value has no quotes, the chosen cast
> expression is a FuncExpr for function numeric_int4(), which has no way
> to suppress errors. When the source value has quotes, the cast
> expression is a CoerceViaIO expression, which can suppress the error.
> The default behavior is to suppress the error and return NULL, so the
> correct behavior is when the source value has quotes.
>
> I think we'll need either:
>
> * fix the code in 0001 to avoid getting numeric_int4() in this case,
> and generally cast functions that don't have soft-error handling
> support, in favor of using IO coercion.
> * fix FuncExpr (like CoerceViaIO) to respect SQL/JSON's request to
> suppress errors and fix downstream functions like numeric_int4() to
> comply by handling errors softly.
>
> I'm inclined to go with the 1st option as we already have the
> infrastructure in place -- input functions can all handle errors
> softly.
not sure this is the right way.
but attached patches solved this problem.
Also, can you share the previous memory-hogging bug issue
when you are free, I want to know which part I am missing.....
Take a look at the json_populate_type() call in ExecEvalJsonCoercion() or specifically compare the new way of passing its void *cache parameter with the earlier patches.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: