Re: problems with foreign keys on partitioned tables
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: problems with foreign keys on partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqF43JQBHKSrfxn846rVb1ycZfnsRakTT9rLhVj=WzGyNw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: problems with foreign keys on partitioned tables (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: problems with foreign keys on partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:16 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Thanks, this is better. There were a few other things I didn't like, so > I updated it. Mostly, two things: > > 1. I didn't like a seqscan on pg_trigger, so I turned that into an > indexed scan on the constraint OID, and then the other two conditions > are checked in the returned tuples. Also, what's the point on > duplicating code and checking how many you deleted? Just delete them > all. Yeah, I didn't quite like what that code looked like, but it didn't occur to me that there's an index on tgconstraint. It looks much better now. > 2. I didn't like the ABI break, and it wasn't necessary: you can just > call createForeignKeyActionTriggers directly. That's much simpler. OK. > I also added tests. While running them, I noticed that my previous > commit was broken in terms of relcache invalidation. I don't really > know if this is a new problem with that commit, or an existing one. The > fix is 0001. Looks good. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: