Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqF3L3QFtNmVuVCeDc27Wjs2zvYCnfR4DO-Ta5jk4rqF9g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 10:12 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 3:12 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: > > > [ v14-0002-Initialize-result-relation-information-lazily.patch ] > > Needs YA rebase over 86dc90056. > > Done. I will post the updated results for -Mprepared benchmarks I did > in the other thread shortly. Test details: pgbench -n -T60 -Mprepared -f nojoin.sql nojoin.sql: \set a random(1, 1000000) update test_table t set b = :a where a = :a; * test_table has 40 columns and partitions as shown below * plan_cache_mode = force_generic_plan Results: nparts master patched 64 6262 17118 128 3449 12082 256 1722 7643 1024 359 2099 * tps figures shown are the median of 3 runs. So, drastic speedup can be seen by even just not creating ResultRelInfos for child relations that are not updated, as the patch does. I haven't yet included any changes for AcquireExecutorLocks() and ExecCheckRTPerms() bottlenecks that still remain and cause the drop in tps as partition count increases. -- Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: