Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
Дата
Msg-id CA+HiwqF1CgsZKvBW_Gz9tErKfOp4t=PQgUKvrvWBG0HP8LdAXQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 10:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:56:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> -   rte->relkind = 0;
>
> > and also handle that field in (read|out)funcs.c
>
> Oh, right.  Ugh, that means a catversion bump.  It's not like
> we've never done that during beta, but it's kind of an annoying
> cost for a detail as tiny as this.

OK, so how about the attached?

I considered adding Assert(relkind == RELKIND_VIEW) in all places that
have the "rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)"
condition, but that seemed like an overkill, so only added one in the
#ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING block in ExecCheckPermissions() that
f75cec4fff877 added.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639)
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stat_io for the startup process