On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 10:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:56:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> - rte->relkind = 0;
>
> > and also handle that field in (read|out)funcs.c
>
> Oh, right. Ugh, that means a catversion bump. It's not like
> we've never done that during beta, but it's kind of an annoying
> cost for a detail as tiny as this.
OK, so how about the attached?
I considered adding Assert(relkind == RELKIND_VIEW) in all places that
have the "rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)"
condition, but that seemed like an overkill, so only added one in the
#ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING block in ExecCheckPermissions() that
f75cec4fff877 added.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com