Re: dropping column prevented due to inherited index
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dropping column prevented due to inherited index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqEn+LAmTNN7oJC4a05N0ai6ymxxwxAKpAT=_1P_ZJdkbQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dropping column prevented due to inherited index (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dropping column prevented due to inherited index
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 6:15 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Apologies for not helping much here; I'm on vacation for a couple of > weeks. No worries, please take your time. > On 2019-Oct-08, Amit Langote wrote: > > > I couldn't imagine how that trick could be implemented for this case. :( > > Can't we pass around an ObjectAddresses pointer to which each recursion > level adds the object(s) it wants to delete, and in the outermost level > we drop everything in it? I vaguely recall we implemented something > like that somewhere within the past year, but all I can find is > 20bef2c3110a. I thought about doing something like that, but wasn't sure if introducing that much complexity is warranted. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: