Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqEDZet3dguM8Dmc75iTu318Kv0WhRSu5rp_RdPWF=cvAQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 1:03 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:29:08PM +0900, Youki Shiraishi wrote: > > I also vote to get rid of such ambiguous stuff. > > As you can see by grepping, "bootstrap-mode backend" (and something > > like that) is also called in the sources as: > > > > - bootstrap backend > > - (basic) bootstrap process > > - backend running in bootstrap mode > > - postgres (backend) program in bootstrap mode > > - bootstrapper > > > > I think "bootstrap backend" is a strong candidate for an alternative > > of "bootstrapper" because it is used in the official documentation of > > initdb. > > It seems to me that "backend running in bootstrap mode" would be the > most consistent way to define that state in a backend process: > $ git grep -i "bootstrap mode backend" | wc -l > 0 > $ git grep -i "bootstrap-mode" | wc -l > 0 > $ git grep -i "bootstrap mode" | wc -l > 68 > $ git grep -i "bootstrap process" | wc -l > 9 > > "bootstrapper" sounds weird. My 2c. Alright, count me in on the "bootstrap mode backend" side too. :) Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: