Re: pg_trigger.tgparentid
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_trigger.tgparentid |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqE17VLba2c7VTx8tb70DkDq0go_tF7tusXJk=1kgp6E=Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_trigger.tgparentid (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_trigger.tgparentid
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 6:56 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > As mentioned in https://postgr.es/m/20191231194759.GA24692@alvherre.pgsql > I propose to add a new column to pg_trigger, which allows us to remove a > pg_depend scan when cloning triggers when adding/attaching partitions. > (It's not that I think the scan is a performance problem, but rather > than notionally we try not to depend on pg_depend contents for this kind > of semantic derivation.) @@ -16541,7 +16493,7 @@ CloneRowTriggersToPartition(Relation parent, Relation partition) * * However, if our parent is a partitioned relation, there might be This is existing text, but should really be: However, if our parent is a *partition* itself, there might be (Sorry, I forgot to report this when the bug-fix went in couple months ago.) * internal triggers that need cloning. In that case, we must skip - * clone it if the trigger on parent depends on another trigger. + * cloning it if the trigger on parent depends on another trigger. 2nd sentence seems unclear to me. Does the following say what needs to be said here: * However, if our parent is a partition itself, there might be * internal triggers that need cloning. For example, triggers on the * parent that were in turn cloned from its own parent are marked * internal, which too must be cloned to the partition. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: