Re: [GENERAL] Sample in documentation
От | Igor Korot |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Sample in documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+FnnTxodYdWi3fb+tgK=qZnfBdj6F+5ztVTwhwq-kr9mbYROQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Sample in documentation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom et al, On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I do not see any arrays named "length", nor even any arrays of size 2, >>> on that page, so I'm pretty confused what you're talking about. Please >>> be more specific. > >> I based my code on this: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26911855/correct-way-to-bind-numeric-values-to-prepared-sql. >> Sorry about that. > > Ah. Well, we can't be responsible for random bits of code posted on > stackoverflow. > >> Nevertheless, while it did compile by MSVC and gcc, it looks like >> Xcode fails with compiling that code. > > Seems to me clang is being overly picky, but whatever. > >> So, is there any solution to this which can be used cross-platform? > > Don't use an initializer, assign the values one at a time. Yes, that's what I ended up doing. > > Back in the day we used to avoid use of initializers for local variables > because they weren't too portable. It's depressing to see clang > introducing new reasons for them not to be portable. OK. It would be nice to see what Borland would do in this case. ;-) BTW, what do you guys use to build binaries for OSX? clang? gcc? Thank you. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: