Re: what to revert
От | Ants Aasma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: what to revert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+CSw_tWj=nn6KbVtSR0xozc40R5WMgu9Pm94E8fRoCET3GsMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: what to revert (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: what to revert
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<p dir="ltr">On 5 May 2016 1:28 a.m., "Andres Freund" <<a href="mailto:andres@anarazel.de">andres@anarazel.de</a>>wrote:<br /> > On 2016-05-04 18:22:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:<br/> > > How would the semantics change?<br /> ><br /> > Right now the time for computing the snapshotis relevant, if<br /> > maintenance of xids is moved, it'll likely be tied to the time xids are<br /> > assigned.That seems perfectly alright, but it'll change behaviour.<p dir="ltr">FWIW moving the maintenance to a clock tickprocess will not change user visible semantics in any significant way. The change could easily be made in the next release.<p dir="ltr">Regards,<br /> Ants Aasma
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: