Re: Parallell Optimizer
От | Ants Aasma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallell Optimizer |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+CSw_sZtzkSpTrEGunzzqHk6+C_DMiEaDqu7=NVnVq7KJT2PA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallell Optimizer (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That idea is not dependent upon CSNs. > > It is an option for us to implement snapshot synchronisation now, we > just haven't done it yet. > > I'm currently working on exporting/importing snapshots on standbys, > which is a precursor to that idea. > > None of the above is any easier/harder with CSNs, nor would it > delay/accelerate delivery of such features. I agree that snapshot synchronization can be done with or without CSNs, but surely synchronizing a single monotonically increasing number is easier than synchronizing lists of running transactions. Regards, Ants Aasma -- Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: