RE: WAL settings
| От | J B |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: WAL settings |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+-SBAUkVSjLg0TSpbFuntL-Y2Nx5w3=oiw85hMWpJxfrHheKA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: WAL settings (Stephen Froehlich <s.froehlich@cablelabs.com>) |
| Ответы |
RE: WAL settings
|
| Список | pgsql-novice |
10 is the default value, as is wal_level = “replica”.
By the way, if you had checked your postgresql-10-main.log after you sent the reload command (always a good idea), it gives exactly this hint as I remember.
--Stephen
From: J B [mailto:mrjanbernat@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:10 AM
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>
Cc: pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WAL settings
Wow thank you, i checked that this was commented out in 9.4 but with setting = 0, but 10.1 has this commented with = 10 so i assume its default value.
2018-02-14 13:50 GMT+01:00 Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>:
Am 14.02.2018 um 13:33 schrieb J B:Hello
I have an issue with WAL settings with postgress 10.1 used for zabbix monitoring system. When i change WAL setting to "minimal" the database goes down. We used this setting in version 9.4 to improve performance of our monitoring server so i would like to replicate this setting.
you have to set max_wal_senders to 0.
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: