Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving
От | Erik Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C967B0EA-6532-4E37-897D-3E1E430ACDD3@myemma.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 18, 2008, at 2:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk> writes: >> I'll set up a cron job to remove them for now, however I'll have a >> look at pg_standby > > Keep in mind that if you delete a log segment that's not yet been sent > to the standby, you've hosed the standby --- you'll have to take a > fresh > base backup and reload the standby with it. This is probably okay for > disaster recovery, but you don't want your script creating the > disaster > all by itself. Which is exactly why I pointed out that using pg_standby's -k switch was the more reliable option. Erik Jones DBA | Emma® erik@myemma.com 800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888 615.292.0777 (fax) Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style. Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: