Re: best use of an EMC SAN
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: best use of an EMC SAN |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | C808D1E7-6FE4-4379-B441-E46F105972AF@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: best use of an EMC SAN (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: best use of an EMC SAN
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Jul 11, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Chris Browne wrote: > - Split off a set (6?) for WAL In my limited testing, 6 drives for WAL would be complete overkill in almost any case. The only example I've ever seen where WAL was able to swamp 2 drives was the DBT testing that Mark Wong was doing at OSDL; the only reason that was the case is because he had somewhere around 70 data drives. I suppose an entirely in-memory database might be able to swamp a 2 drive WAL as well. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: