Re: SHOW TABLES
От | Hans-Jürgen Schönig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SHOW TABLES |
Дата | |
Msg-id | C7B68B40-4F76-4A91-8A3E-1648C0603E47@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SHOW TABLES (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 18:35, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 17:38 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> Is there an actual common use-case for having these commands available >>> for *non-psql* interfaces? >> >> There are many interfaces out there and people writing new ones >> everyday. We just wrote an interface for Android, for example. >> >> It is arguably *more* important to do this from non-psql interfaces. >> >> There should be one command to "display a list of tables" and it needs >> to be easily guessable for those who have forgotten. > > The downside is that you are then limited to what can be returned as a > resultset. A "\d table" in psql returns a hell of a lot more than > that. So do we keep two separate formats for this? Or do we remove the > current, useful, output format in favor of a much worse formt just to > support more clients? > i am not seeing this as an "instead" solution. this is an "additional" solution. SHOW TABLES etc could return a set of table. there is not need to change good of \d for that. it just a plain add on. everything else would be simply bad. many thanks, hans -- Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: